linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, 14/18, v2] ftrace/lockdep: Have the RCU lockdep splat show what function triggered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 3 Sep 2013 21:10:00 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re:  [RFC, 14/18, v2] ftrace/lockdep: Have the RCU lockdep splat
 show what function triggered

On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 16:28:36 +0800
Wang Shilong <wangshilong1991@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello, Using checkpatch.pl, i get the following warnings(errors):
> WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
> #90: FILE: kernel/trace/trace_functions.c:583:
> +		printk("ftrace_rcu_func: %pS\n",
> 
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 53 lines checked
> 
> patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
> are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
> CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
> 

The code is called by lockdep, which uses printk() directly as well.
This will stay a printk() until lockdep changes.

And please, do not send a patch to change lockdep.

-- Steve

> Thanks, Wang
> 
> Notic: this is an automated generated by shell script
> Any problems please contact: wangshilong1991@...il.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/