[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:32:13 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Sam Creasey <sammy@...my.net>, Luis Alves <ljalvs@...il.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove deprecated IRQF_DISABLED
On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Michael Opdenacker
<michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> This patch proposes to remove the IRQF_DISABLED flag from m68k architecture
> code. It's a NOOP since 2.6.35 and it will be removed one day.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com>
Thanks!
BTW, 2 years ago Yong Zhang sent 3 big versions of series removing
IRQF_DISABLED everywhere.
At that time, I had hoped they would all go in through tglx:
| > But do you expect the individual
| > maintainers to take these patches, or are you just collecting Acks?
|
| Quoted from Thomas's reply to Ralf (MIPS):
| [ We can hold off the "remove the define" patch until 3.2-rc1 and push
| it along with everything which hasn't been merged until then.
but apparently that never happened... oh well...
Anyway, will queue if nothing happens at the global front...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists