[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 11:18:24 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <stefan.bader@...onical.com>,
<stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>, <jeremy@...p.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xen/spinlock: We don't need the old structure anymore
On 07/09/13 14:46, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> As we are piggybacking on the generic ticketlock structs
> and these old structures are not needed anymore.
"As we are using the generic ticket lock..."
"piggybacking" suggests the Xen code isn't using a standard interface
for this.
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists