[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 16:37:16 +0530
From: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
david.vrabel@...rix.com, stefan.bader@...onical.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] xen/spinlock: Don't setup xen spinlock IPI kicker if disabled.
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> There is no need to setup this IPI kicker if we are never going
> to use the paravirtualized ticketlock mechanism.
Excellent patch; the important takeaway is that paravirtualization is
still quite useful in the real world.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists