[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:07:21 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dcache: Translating dentry into pathname without
taking rename_lock
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:55:06PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> >I'm not sure I like mixing rcu_read_lock() into that - d_path() and friends
> >can do that themselves just fine (it needs to be taken when seq is even),
> >and e.g. d_walk() doesn't need it at all. Other than that, I'm OK with
> >this variant.
>
> I think rcu_read_lock() is needed to make sure that the dentry won't
> be freed as we don't take d_lock now.
Sure, you do need that; the question is whether you need to take it in
the primitives you are introducing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists