[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:06:59 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
To: David Lang <david@...g.hm>
CC: "Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] One more attempt at useful kernel lockdown
On Mon, 2013-09-09 at 11:53 -0700, David Lang wrote:
> So is there a way to unify these different things rather than creating yet
> another different knob?
We haven't found one that people consider generally acceptable.
--
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists