linux-kernel - Re: kernel deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 09:56:35 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:	Gerlando Falauto <gerlando.falauto@...mile.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"Brunck, Holger" <Holger.Brunck@...mile.com>,
	"Longchamp, Valentin" <Valentin.Longchamp@...mile.com>,
	"Bigler, Stefan" <Stefan.Bigler@...mile.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel deadlock

On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 01:29:47PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> Ingo: This makes me think we really should have some lockdep smarts
> added to seqlock/seqcount structures. Is there something already
> discovered thats preventing this, or has this just not yet been tried?

The only reason this hasn't been done in the past is because of the VDSO
I believe. We use a seqcount_t from userspace.

We either have to open-code the VDSO version or create a variant for
that specific single use case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/