linux-kernel - Re: [performance regression, bisected] scheduler: should_we

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:06:35 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [performance regression, bisected] scheduler:
 should_we_balance() kills filesystem performance

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 01:47:59PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 7f0a5e6..9b3fe1c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5151,7 +5151,7 @@ static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env)
>          * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group
>          * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains.
>          */
> -       return balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu;
> +       return balance_cpu == env->dst_cpu;
>  }

Duh.. /me kicks himself for not seeing that.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/