linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of cpus.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 16:56:02 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
cc:	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of
 cpus.

Here is a draft of a patch to do autoconfig if CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is
set.


Subject: Simple autoconfig for tickless system

This is on top of the prior patch that restricts the cpus that
kthread can spawn processes on.

It ensures that one processor per node is kept in regular
HZ mode and also adds that cpu to the kthread_mask so that
OS services (like kswapd etc) can run.

On a two node system two processors will be available for kthread and OS services.
The rest will be tickless and kept as free from OS services as possible.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>

Index: linux/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c	2013-09-05 09:10:59.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/kernel/time/tick-sched.c	2013-09-11 11:46:59.387888072 -0500
@@ -330,7 +330,30 @@ static int tick_nohz_init_all(void)
 	}
 	err = 0;
 	cpumask_setall(tick_nohz_full_mask);
+
+	/* Exempt boot processor and use it for OS services */
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_nohz_full_mask);
+	cpumask_set(smp_processor_id(), cpumask_kthread_mask);
+
+	/* And one processor for each NUMA node */
+	for_each_node(node) {
+		struct cpumask *m = cpumask_of_node(node);
+
+		/* Boot node ? */
+		if (node == numa_node_id())
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Exempt the first processor on each node that has
+		 * processors available.
+		 */
+		if (cpumask_weight(m)) {
+			int cpu = cpumask_first(m);
+
+			cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, tick_nohz_full_mask);
+			cpumask_set(cpu, cpu_kthread_mask);
+		}
+	}
 	tick_nohz_full_running = true;
 #endif
 	return err;
Index: linux/kernel/cpu.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/cpu.c	2013-09-11 10:45:47.686052132 -0500
+++ linux/kernel/cpu.c	2013-09-11 11:49:34.122210075 -0500
@@ -682,12 +682,14 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(cpu_kthread_bits,
 const struct cpumask *const cpu_kthread_mask = to_cpumask(cpu_kthread_bits);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpu_kthread_mask);

+#ifndef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL
 static int __init kthread_setup(char *str)
 {
         cpulist_parse(str, (struct cpumask *)&cpu_kthread_bits);
         return 1;
 }
 __setup("kthread=", kthread_setup);
+#endif


 void set_cpu_possible(unsigned int cpu, bool possible)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/