lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:16:32 +0400
From:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Wolfram Gloger <wg@...loc.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Out-of-bounds access in get_wchan (arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c)

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Indeed, get_wchan ensures that fp<stack+THREAD_SIZE, but then dereferences fp+8:
>>
>> 434                 if (fp < (unsigned long)stack ||
>> 435                     fp >= (unsigned long)stack+THREAD_SIZE)
>> 436                         return 0;
>> 437                 ip = *(u64 *)(fp+8);
>>
>> It must check that fp+8<stack+THREAD_SIZE.
>> As far as I see, the bug can lead to garbage return values or in the
>> worst case to crash.
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> The change looks good to me. Can you please submit a formal signed off patch
> to x86@...nel.org ?

Hi Andi,

Wolfram has a patch for it.
Wolfram, please send your patch to x86@...nel.org.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ