lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:25:06 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lidza Louina <lidza.louina@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgnc: fix potential format string flaw

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 11:19 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:19:17PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> In the former case, format characters will get processed by the
>> >> sprintf logic. In the latter, they are printed as-is. In this specific
>> >> case, if there was a way to inject strings like "ohai %n" into the
>> >> msgbuf string, the former would actually attempt to resolve the %n. In
>> >> the simple case, this could lead to Oopses, and in the unlucky case,
>> >> it could allow arbitrary memory writing and execution control.
>> >>
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncontrolled_format_string
>> >
>> > The kernel ignores %n so hopefully it can't actually write to memory.
>>
>> I wish! This is not the case, though. See FORMAT_TYPE_NRCHARS in
>> lib/vsprintf.c's vsnprintf().
>>
>> $ git grep '%n' | wc -l
>> 111
>
> Umm.
>
> See: lib/vsprintf.c
>
> /**
>  * vsnprintf - Format a string and place it in a buffer
> [...]
>  * %n is ignored
>
> %n does work for vsscanf though.

The comment is a lie:

        int len = 0;
        printk("len:%d\n", len);
        printk("%s%n\n", "Ohai!", &len);
        printk("len:%d\n", len);

[    0.025930] len:0
[    0.026003] Ohai!
[    0.026261] len:5

The functionality between scanf and printf was, I think, merged in
2009, if I'm reading the git blame correctly.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ