linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kthread: Make kthread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:55:31 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: Make kthread_create() killable.

Hi Tetsuo,

please do not start the off-list discussions ;)

On 09/15, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> I examined do_coredump() case and found similar result.

...

> Do we want to change from call_usermodehelper_exec(UMH_WAIT_EXEC) to
> call_usermodehelper_exec(UMH_WAIT_EXEC | UMH_WAIT_KILLABLE)

To me, this makes sense in any case. And this matches other recent
"make coredump killable" changes.

> thread (who is waiting for pipe reader process to start) can terminate as soon
> as possible (rather than waiting forever unless somebody releases memory)?

But as for OOM this can't help if the dumping process is multithreaded.
This connects to other problems we discuss in another thread. probably
I should send the patch which does s/PT_TRACE_EXIT/SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP/
at least.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/