linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove all uses of printf's %n

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:59:42 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remove all uses of printf's %n

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Tetsuo Handa
<penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Kees Cook wrote:
>> -     seq_printf(m, "%s%d%n", con->name, con->index, &len);
>> -     len = 21 - len;
>> +     len = m->count;
>> +     seq_printf(m, "%s%d", con->name, con->index);
>> +     len = 21 - (m->count - len);
>
> Why not to create a new function which returns bytes written?
> The new function does not need to return negative value for indicating errors.

I think it's not worth it for two reasons:

- there are very few callers that need this logic
- it would require a new function for each type of function used
(right now both seq_printf and seq_puts are used).

Perhaps instead of seq->count, there should be an access function?
seq_get_count(seq) or something?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/