linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] S+core Architecture : fix bugs for compiling and support necessary functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:02:26 +0800
From:	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liqin.linux@...il.com,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] S+core Architecture : fix bugs for compiling and
 support necessary functions

OK, thanks for your reminding, most the format is referenced from
other git pull requests, however, I still miss something, I will fix
them.

How detailed content shold a summary have? I indeed have made some
summary in the commits. Could you give me an example?

About why I didn't send a copy to Linus. Because the document
SubmittingPatches has no this rule. I indeed notice that  many git
pull requests sent a copy to Linus, but I think I should follow the
documented rule. If it is a new rule, thanks for telling me the rule
,and maybe the document should be added this rule.
Adopt this rule...
"
5) Select e-mail destination.
Look through the MAINTAINERS file and the source code, and determine
if your change applies to a specific subsystem of the kernel, with
an assigned maintainer.  If so, e-mail that person.  The script
scripts/get_maintainer.pl can be very useful at this step.
If no maintainer is listed, or the maintainer does not respond, send
your patch to the primary Linux kernel developer's mailing list,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.  Most kernel developers monitor this
e-mail list, and can comment on your changes.

Do not send more than 15 patches at once to the vger mailing lists!!!

Linus Torvalds is the final arbiter of all changes accepted into the
Linux kernel.  His e-mail address is <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>.
He gets a lot of e-mail, so typically you should do your best to -avoid-
sending him e-mail.
"

Anyway, I appreciate your notifiction and I will fix this errors.

Best,
Lennox

2013/9/16 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 05:42:07PM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
>> Hi Linus,
>> Please pull these updates for S+core architecture. These updates include
>> updating information of maintainers, fix some trivial errors, and add
>> a necessary function for supporting ipv6.
>>
>> The following changes since commit bdbdfdef5766c2a60185e946df242f1bc0d37c09
>>
>> Merge tag 'hwmon-for-linus' of
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging
>> (Fri Sep 13 10:58:41 2013 -0700)
>>
>> on
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>>
>>
>> For you to fetch changes up to 969f99168b9dff2f6cc07cdf14255178d4397c4f
>>
>> git@...hub.com:sctscore/official-linux.git tags/branch-linus-20130914
>>
>> Best,
>> Lennox Wu
>>
> Your e-mail is not signed. You don't even have a pgp key as far as
> I can see, at least not one associated with your e-mail address.
> How do you expect anyone to establish your identity ?
>
> In addition to that, the tag in your repository is not signed and
> does not contain a summary of your changes. Your patches do not
> have a Signed-off-by: tag. The pull message below appears to be
> hand-edited and does not match an auto-generated pull request
> (which should have given you a hint that the commit logs have
> a problem).
>
> You did not even copy Linus on this e-mail. Do you really think
> he would even notice your pull request, much less apply it ?
>
> Guenter
>
>> -----------------------------------------------
>> Summary these commits:
>> 1. Fix some trivial errors for successfully compiling the latest
>> version Linux kernel.
>> 2. Provide necessary function for support IPV6.
>> 3. Update the information of maintainers.
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> Lennox Wu (8):
>> score : Update the information of Score maintainers
>> score : Implement the function csum_ipv6_magic
>> score : arch/score/kernel/entry.S: fix wrong instructions
>> score : arch/score/kernel/process.c : fix some typos
>> score : Modify the MAKEFILE of Score
>>
>>  MAINTAINERS                       |    4 +-
>>  arch/score/Kconfig                |    4 ++
>>  arch/score/Makefile               |    4 +-
>>  arch/score/include/asm/checksum.h |   93 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>>  arch/score/include/asm/io.h       |    1 -
>>  arch/score/include/asm/pgalloc.h  |    2 +-
>>  arch/score/kernel/entry.S         |    4 +-
>>  arch/score/kernel/process.c       |    4 +-
>>  8 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>
>>
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/