linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] S+core Architecture : fix bugs for compiling and support necessary functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:48:38 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liqin.linux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] S+core Architecture : fix bugs for compiling and
 support necessary functions

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 11:42:54AM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> What does the "e-mail is not signed" mean? I try to search some
> information, but I still do not understand what you say.
> 
This is a signed e-mail. It guarantees that it is from me and not from an
arbitrary person calling himself Guenter Roeck.

Guenter

> Best,
> Lennox
> 
> 2013/9/16 Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>:
> > OK, thanks for your reminding, most the format is referenced from
> > other git pull requests, however, I still miss something, I will fix
> > them.
> >
> > How detailed content shold a summary have? I indeed have made some
> > summary in the commits. Could you give me an example?
> >
> > About why I didn't send a copy to Linus. Because the document
> > SubmittingPatches has no this rule. I indeed notice that  many git
> > pull requests sent a copy to Linus, but I think I should follow the
> > documented rule. If it is a new rule, thanks for telling me the rule
> > ,and maybe the document should be added this rule.
> > Adopt this rule...
> > "
> > 5) Select e-mail destination.
> > Look through the MAINTAINERS file and the source code, and determine
> > if your change applies to a specific subsystem of the kernel, with
> > an assigned maintainer.  If so, e-mail that person.  The script
> > scripts/get_maintainer.pl can be very useful at this step.
> > If no maintainer is listed, or the maintainer does not respond, send
> > your patch to the primary Linux kernel developer's mailing list,
> > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org.  Most kernel developers monitor this
> > e-mail list, and can comment on your changes.
> >
> > Do not send more than 15 patches at once to the vger mailing lists!!!
> >
> > Linus Torvalds is the final arbiter of all changes accepted into the
> > Linux kernel.  His e-mail address is <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>.
> > He gets a lot of e-mail, so typically you should do your best to -avoid-
> > sending him e-mail.
> > "
> >
> > Anyway, I appreciate your notifiction and I will fix this errors.
> >
> > Best,
> > Lennox
> >
> >
> > 2013/9/16 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>:
> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 05:42:07PM +0800, Lennox Wu wrote:
> >>> Hi Linus,
> >>> Please pull these updates for S+core architecture. These updates include
> >>> updating information of maintainers, fix some trivial errors, and add
> >>> a necessary function for supporting ipv6.
> >>>
> >>> The following changes since commit bdbdfdef5766c2a60185e946df242f1bc0d37c09
> >>>
> >>> Merge tag 'hwmon-for-linus' of
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/groeck/linux-staging
> >>> (Fri Sep 13 10:58:41 2013 -0700)
> >>>
> >>> on
> >>>
> >>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> For you to fetch changes up to 969f99168b9dff2f6cc07cdf14255178d4397c4f
> >>>
> >>> git@...hub.com:sctscore/official-linux.git tags/branch-linus-20130914
> >>>
> >>> Best,
> >>> Lennox Wu
> >>>
> >> Your e-mail is not signed. You don't even have a pgp key as far as
> >> I can see, at least not one associated with your e-mail address.
> >> How do you expect anyone to establish your identity ?
> >>
> >> In addition to that, the tag in your repository is not signed and
> >> does not contain a summary of your changes. Your patches do not
> >> have a Signed-off-by: tag. The pull message below appears to be
> >> hand-edited and does not match an auto-generated pull request
> >> (which should have given you a hint that the commit logs have
> >> a problem).
> >>
> >> You did not even copy Linus on this e-mail. Do you really think
> >> he would even notice your pull request, much less apply it ?
> >>
> >> Guenter
> >>
> >>> -----------------------------------------------
> >>> Summary these commits:
> >>> 1. Fix some trivial errors for successfully compiling the latest
> >>> version Linux kernel.
> >>> 2. Provide necessary function for support IPV6.
> >>> 3. Update the information of maintainers.
> >>> ------------------------------------------------
> >>> Lennox Wu (8):
> >>> score : Update the information of Score maintainers
> >>> score : Implement the function csum_ipv6_magic
> >>> score : arch/score/kernel/entry.S: fix wrong instructions
> >>> score : arch/score/kernel/process.c : fix some typos
> >>> score : Modify the MAKEFILE of Score
> >>>
> >>>  MAINTAINERS                       |    4 +-
> >>>  arch/score/Kconfig                |    4 ++
> >>>  arch/score/Makefile               |    4 +-
> >>>  arch/score/include/asm/checksum.h |   93 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>>  arch/score/include/asm/io.h       |    1 -
> >>>  arch/score/include/asm/pgalloc.h  |    2 +-
> >>>  arch/score/kernel/entry.S         |    4 +-
> >>>  arch/score/kernel/process.c       |    4 +-
> >>>  8 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
> >>> --
> >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> >>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)