linux-kernel - Re: [dtc PATCH] Ensure all tests have matching reg and unit address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 08:52:32 +1000
From:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Jon Loeliger <jdl@....com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	frowand.list@...il.com, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [dtc PATCH] Ensure all tests have matching reg and unit address

On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:49:41AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/19/2013 06:18 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 02:23:02PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> >> 
> >> ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that
> >> any node that has a reg property must include a unit address in
> >> its name with value matching the first entry in its reg property.
> >> Conversely, if a node does not have a reg property, the node name
> >> must not include a unit address.
> >> 
> >> Adjust all the dtc test-cases to conform to this rule.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
> > 
> > Yeah, the testcase examples were built as purely syntactic
> > exercises without really considering dt content conventions.
> > Fixing them up is arguably unnnecessary, but certainly doesn't hurt
> > and makes them better as examples.
> > 
> > Applied and pushed.
> 
> Strange; I see that the git author field ended up as you rather than
> me. Did you need to apply the patch manually for some reason (if so,
> what did I do wrong?) or did something go wrong in the patch
> application process?

Oh, dammit.  git citool did that when I added my S-o-b, and I forgot
to fix it up.  I just patched it up and did a push -f, I hope not too
many people have pulled in the meantime :(.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped