linux-kernel - Re: Would an "information module" be useful?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 07:47:56 +0200
From:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:	Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Would an "information module" be useful?

Markus,

Am 23.09.2013 04:38, schrieb Markus Elfring:
> Would it become useful to move "drivers" which do not manage hardware to a
> separate directory?
> Should such source files belong to a different software category (or "class")?

IMHO it would be not very useful.
We have more serious issues to solve. :-)

Thanks,
//richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/