lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:29:18 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
	edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	sbw@....edu, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/11] rcu: Micro-optimize rcu_cpu_has_callbacks()

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

The for_each_rcu_flavor() loop unconditionally scans all flavors, even
when the first flavor might have some non-lazy callbacks.  Once the
loop has seen a non-lazy callback, further passes through the loop
cannot change the state.  This is not a huge problem, given that there
can be at most three RCU flavors (RCU-bh, RCU-preempt, and RCU-sched),
but this code is on the path to idle, so speeding it up even a small
amount would have some benefit.

This commit therefore does two things:

1.	Rearranges the order of the list of RCU flavors in order to
	place the most active flavor first in the list.  The most active
	RCU flavor is RCU-preempt, or, if there is no RCU-preempt,
	RCU-sched.

2.	Reworks the for_each_rcu_flavor() to exit early when the first
	non-lazy callback is seen, or, in the case where the caller
	does not care about non-lazy callbacks (RCU_FAST_NO_HZ=n),
	when the first callback is seen.

Reported-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index e6f2e8f..49464ad 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -2727,10 +2727,13 @@ static int rcu_cpu_has_callbacks(int cpu, bool *all_lazy)
 
 	for_each_rcu_flavor(rsp) {
 		rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, cpu);
-		if (rdp->qlen != rdp->qlen_lazy)
+		if (!rdp->nxtlist)
+			continue;
+		hc = true;
+		if (rdp->qlen != rdp->qlen_lazy || !all_lazy) {
 			al = false;
-		if (rdp->nxtlist)
-			hc = true;
+			break;
+		}
 	}
 	if (all_lazy)
 		*all_lazy = al;
@@ -3297,8 +3300,8 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 
 	rcu_bootup_announce();
 	rcu_init_geometry();
-	rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
 	rcu_init_one(&rcu_bh_state, &rcu_bh_data);
+	rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
 	__rcu_init_preempt();
 	open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ