lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:14:03 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	<mingo@...nel.org>, <hpa@...or.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pjt@...gle.com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <lkp@...org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/core] sched/balancing: Fix cfs_rq-> task_h_load calculation

On 09/29/2013 01:47 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 06:46:59AM -0700, tip-bot for Vladimir Davydov wrote:
>> Commit-ID:  7e3115ef5149fc502e3a2e80719dba54a8e7409d
>> Gitweb:http://git.kernel.org/tip/7e3115ef5149fc502e3a2e80719dba54a8e7409d
>> Author:     Vladimir Davydov<vdavydov@...allels.com>
>> AuthorDate: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:39:46 +0400
>> Committer:  Ingo Molnar<mingo@...nel.org>
>> CommitDate: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:59:39 +0200
>>
>> sched/balancing: Fix cfs_rq->task_h_load calculation
>>
>> Patch a003a2 (sched: Consider runnable load average in move_tasks())
>> sets all top-level cfs_rqs' h_load to rq->avg.load_avg_contrib, which is
>> always 0. This mistype leads to all tasks having weight 0 when load
>> balancing in a cpu-cgroup enabled setup. There obviously should be sum
>> of weights of all runnable tasks there instead. Fix it.
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> FYI, Here we found a 17% netperf regression by this patch. Here are some
> changed stats between this commit 7e3115ef5149fc502e3a2e80719dba54a8e7409d
> and it's parent(3029ede39373c368f402a76896600d85a4f7121b)

Hello,

Could you please report the following info:

1) the test machine cpu topology (i.e. output of 
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/{thread_siblings_list,core_siblings_list})
2) kernel config you used during the test
3) the output of /sys/kernel/debug/sched_features (debugfs mounted).
4) netperf server/client options
5) did you place netserver into a separate cpu cgroup?

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ