linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 1 Oct 2013 10:53:10 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	huawei.libin@...wei.com, wangyijing@...wei.com,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, guohanjun@...wei.com,
	paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v1.1] x86, boot: Further compress CPUs bootup message


* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 08:28:48AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > If the goal is to feed this to the field width in printf, which I would 
> > > think would be the dominant use, then you do have to account for the 
> > > minus sign.
> > 
> > The input here is always a nonzero positive integer.
> > 
> > Anyway, I have no objections against using the more generic library 
> > function either.
> 
> Ok, let's do it this way - if someone wants to change it later, she can
> split/carve/write anew/whatever it... I don't care anymore.
> 
> :-)

Looks perfect to me!

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/