linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Define SMU clock DT bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 2 Oct 2013 10:28:37 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp, SH-Linux <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
	Shinya Kuribayashi <shinya.kuribayashi.px@...esas.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Define SMU clock DT bindings

On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 01:36:33PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Yoshii-san and Simon,
> 
> On Tuesday 24 September 2013 13:52:15 Simon Horman wrote:
> > [ Cc Laurent ]
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 01:13:31PM +0900, takasi-y@....dti.ne.jp wrote:
> > > Device tree clock binding document for EMMA Mobile EV2 SMU.
> > > Following nodes are defined to describe clock tree.
> > > - renesas,emev2-smu
> > > - renesas,emev2-smu-clkdiv
> > > - renesas,emev2-smu-gclk
> > 
> > I realise this has been entirely consistent in the past and
> > even as recently as Linus' pre v3.12-rc2 master branch.
> > However, after some recent discussion we are now trying to make our
> > compatibility strings consistently of the form renesas,<unit>-<soc>.
> > 
> > With this in mind I believe the strings should be:
> > 
> > - renesas,smu-emev2
> > - renesas,smu-clkdiv-emev2
> > - renesas,smu-gclk-emev2
> > 
> > To be honest I am not quite sure about the "-clkdiv" and "-gclk"
> > bits and I would appreciate some review from others.
> 
> I don't have access to the EMEV2 datasheet so my ability to comment on this is 
> somehow limited. However, given that the clock hardware is very SoC-specific, 
> it might make sense to keep the names proposed by Yoshii-san. This would be 
> consistent with the other clock bindings.

Thanks Laurent. If that seems fine by you then it is fine by me.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/