linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 2013 17:47:08 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 25

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:30:51PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:

> It's a good idea, unfortunately Stephen has already went to vocation.
> I could try the auto merge and merge-failure reports and hand the
> script over to Stephen when he is back. However the merge conflicts
> will have to be handled by the relevant developer/maintainers.

Well, Thierry and myself are running this at the minute by hand so
perhaps there's not that much need.  On the other hand doing the build
tests after each merge is rather resource intensive and that's where
your system excels - it'd be good to get the tree we're publishing
verified that way.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)