linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: make sure we do not read beyond allocation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:58:24 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: make sure we do not read beyond allocation

On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 09:34:11AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> In dentry_string_cmp (via__d_lookup_rcu), when CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
> is set, word-width memory reads are performed. However, the string
> allocation size may not be a multiple of the word size. To avoid reading
> past the end of such an allocation, we must allocate in multiples of
> the word size.

grep ^kmalloc /proc/slabinfo.  Observe the suffix after "kmalloc-"...

IOW, kmalloc() does round its argument up.  Seeing that we allocate an
external name only when allocation has to be longer than 32 bytes, the
sucker is guaranteed to be at least a multiple of 32 by the time we
pick the fitting cache (the worst case is when length is between 65
and 96; then we use kmalloc-96).

When you start a port to a 512-bit architecture, you'll have much nastier
problems than this one...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/