lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Oct 2013 18:28:26 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [pchecks v2 0/2] percpu v3: Implement Preemption checks for __this_cpu operations

This patchset introduces preemption checks for __this_cpu operations.

First we add new raw_cpu operations that perform this cpu operations
without preempt checks. 

The second patch then adds the preempt checks by modifying the
__this_cpu macros in include/linux/percpu.h

V2->V3:
	- Subject line in the raw_cpu_ops patch had ; instead of :.
	  Guess I am getting old.
	- Improve descriptions and variable names.
	- Run tests again with kvm to verify that it still works.
		A) No warnings with just the patches applied
		B) Lots of warnings with CONFIG_DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS enabled
		C) No warnings with 3 core patches applied that simply convert
			__this_cpu operations to raw_cpu_ops.

V1->V2:
	- Reuse preemption check logic in lib/smp_processor_id.c
	- Add CONFIG_DEBUG_THIS_CPU_OPERATIONS
	- Remove conversions to the use of raw_cpu_ops since
	  these may require some discussion first.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ