lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 7 Oct 2013 14:47:59 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] pci: convert bus code to use dev_groups

On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:21:36PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Sachin]
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:55 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > The dev_attrs field of struct bus_type is going away soon, dev_groups
>> > should be used instead.  This converts the PCI bus code to use the
>> > correct field.
>> >
>> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
>> > Cc: <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
>> > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> > ---
>> >
>> > Bjorn, I can take this through my driver-core tree if you like, just let
>> > me know what would be the easiest for you.
>>
>> Let me take it, if I can figure out how to do it.  I already tripped
>> over a conflict where Sachin made pci_bus_attrs static, which is fine
>> in linux-next (with your 244afeca ("PCI: convert bus code to
>> use bus_groups") commit), but not fine in pci/next, which didn't have that.
>
> Ah, yeah, that will conflict, sorry.
>
>> I should be able to "git merge --no-ff --log gregkh/driver-core-next"
>> into my "next" branch, then apply your patch as usual, right?
>
> You can, but do you really want all of my driver-core changes in there?
> I can just send you the one pci change and you can then apply both of
> them.  Then when we merge with Linus, there will not be any conflicts as
> the same patches just showed up in two different trees, which should be
> fine.

Yes, putting just the PCI changes in my tree sounds much better.  I'll
try to work out what I need, and I'll poke you again if I need help :)

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ