linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Make the 80-character limit a --strict check only

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Oct 2013 22:23:02 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@...ux-foundation.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Make the 80-character limit a --strict
 check only

On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 12:34:33PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:

> I've seen far more examples of the 80-column limit making code less
> readable rather than more.  It's only really helpful when it forces code
> restructuring, *not* when it just forces an arbitrary line break.

So teach that piece of crap to complain about fucked-in-head line breaks like
							ret_val =
							    leaf_shift_left(tb,
									    tb->
									    lnum
									    [0],
									    tb->
									    lbytes
									    -
									    1);
in addition to obscenely long lines (and yes, it is a real-world example).

The one and only point of such tools is to help locating the crappy code.
And that's the only sane criterion for evaluating new "stylistic rules" -
does that particular heuristic catch enough shitty places or not?

_Anything_ can be obfuscated to the point where warnings are not produced
anymore...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/