[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBROM9jZfkU7suD-7=N=M38BCcVgdbgKoe-GE1RhY0puEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 09:15:30 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf: mmap2 not covering VM_CLONE regions
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 11:04:38PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Peter,
>>
>> Ok, so I tried this. It does not cover shmat() cases unfortunately.
>> We need that same ++global_mm_id somewhere on that code path.
>> Haven't looked at it in details just yet.
>
> shmat() is a regular shared memory thingy right? So that should be
> covered by the regular inode,dev bits, right?
Yes, it is but I am trying to see whether or not we could unify that and
use a single u64 number to uniquely identify each mapping.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists