lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 9 Oct 2013 20:52:20 -0400
From:	Josef Bacik <jbacik@...ionio.com>
To:	"Geyslan G. Bem" <geyslan@...il.com>
CC:	<chris.mason@...ionio.com>, <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-br@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] btrfs: Fix memory leakage in the tree-log.c

On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 08:40:30PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> In some cases, add_inode_ref() is returning without freeing
> the 'name' pointer.
> 
> Added bail out to explicitly call kfree when necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 10 ++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> index 79f057c..ad7cc5f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> @@ -1170,13 +1170,16 @@ static noinline int add_inode_ref(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>  			if (!dir)
>  				dir = read_one_inode(root, parent_objectid);
>  			if (!dir)
> -				return -ENOENT;
> +			{
> +				ret = -ENOENT;
> +				goto bail;
> +			}

Code formatting is

if () {
}

not

if ()
{
}


>  		} else {
>  			ret = ref_get_fields(eb, ref_ptr, &namelen, &name,
>  					     &ref_index);
>  		}
>  		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
> +			goto bail;
>  
>  		/* if we already have a perfect match, we're done */
>  		if (!inode_in_dir(root, path, btrfs_ino(dir), btrfs_ino(inode),
> @@ -1227,6 +1230,9 @@ out:
>  	btrfs_release_path(path);
>  	iput(dir);
>  	iput(inode);
> +bail:
> +	if (name)
> +		kfree(name);

kfree already does the if (name) part of this so this is redundant.  Also if you
are going to do this you need to set name = NULL; after the kfree above it
otherwise we have a double free.  Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ