linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 12:03:54 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:	Maxime COQUELIN <maxime.coquelin@...com>
Cc:	Srinivas KANDAGATLA <srinivas.kandagatla@...com>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stephen GALLIMORE <stephen.gallimore@...com>,
	Stuart MENEFY <stuart.menefy@...com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Gabriel FERNANDEZ <gabriel.fernandez@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add I2C support to ST SoCs


> > Changes since v3:
> >    - Switch back to vendor specific DT properties regarding the anti-glitch
> >      filter configuration, as this IP is the only one having such a filter.
> Do you agree to keep these properties vendor-specifics?

My preference is generic bindings. There are no other users right now,
yet there might be in the future. At least with something similar enough
that the bindings will apply. Was hoping for some additional input,
though, but I am not depending on it.

> If so, could you take this series for v3.13?

Sure, if it passes the second review...


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)