[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 15:25:07 +0000
From: Bhushan Bharat-R65777 <R65777@...escale.com>
To: Wood Scott-B07421 <B07421@...escale.com>
CC: Yoder Stuart-B08248 <B08248@...escale.com>,
Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...aro.org>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com" <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
"agraf@...e.de" <agraf@...e.de>,
Sethi Varun-B16395 <B16395@...escale.com>,
"peter.maydell@...aro.org" <peter.maydell@...aro.org>,
"santosh.shukla@...aro.org" <santosh.shukla@...aro.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 8:53 PM
> To: Bhushan Bharat-R65777
> Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex
> Williamson; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com;
> agraf@...e.de; Sethi Varun-B16395; peter.maydell@...aro.org;
> santosh.shukla@...aro.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a platform device
>
> On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 02:45 -0500, Bhushan Bharat-R65777 wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 1:33 AM
> > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > > Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Kim Phillips; Christoffer Dall; Alex
> > > Williamson; linux- kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> > > a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com; agraf@...e.de; Sethi Varun-B16395;
> > > Bhushan Bharat-R65777; peter.maydell@...aro.org;
> > > santosh.shukla@...aro.org; kvm@...r.kernel.org;
> > > gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
> > > Subject: Re: RFC: (re-)binding the VFIO platform driver to a
> > > platform device
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 14:44 -0500, Yoder Stuart-B08248 wrote:
> > > > Ah, think I understand now...yes that works as well, and would be
> > > > less intrustive. So are you writing a patch? :)
> > >
> > > I've been meaning to since the previous round of discussion, but I've been
> busy.
> > > Would someone else be able to test it in the context of using it for VFIO?
> >
> > I wish I could have but I do not have vfio-platform stuff.
>
> VFIO PCI without new_id would also be a useful test.
I will do that :)
-Bharat
>
> -Scott
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists