linux-kernel - Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:32:41 +0200
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: scsi-mq updated to latest linux-block/new-queue

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 09:17:14PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > What is the criteria for patches to include in your tree? I would suggest
> > to consider this one https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/9/90 if it fits.
> 
> For this one you probably want to send a patch to Jens to move blk-mq-tag.h
> to include/linux first instead of doing the relative include hack.

I wonder, if blk-mq- prefix should remain?.. This s code seems pretty much
generic to me.

> Also the  blk_mq_*tag* routines you use aren't exported, so a modular build of
> the driver with that patch applied will fail.

Yep, makes sense. Thanks for pointing out.

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/