linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: initialize PG_reserved for tail pages of gigantig compound pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:13:43 -0300
From:	Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>
To:	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: hugetlb: initialize PG_reserved for tail pages of
 gigantig compound pages

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> 11feeb498086a3a5907b8148bdf1786a9b18fc55 introduced a memory leak when
> KVM is run on gigantic compound pages.
> 
> 11feeb498086a3a5907b8148bdf1786a9b18fc55 depends on the assumption
> that PG_reserved is identical for all head and tail pages of a
> compound page. So that if get_user_pages returns a tail page, we don't
> need to check the head page in order to know if we deal with a
> reserved page that requires different refcounting.
> 
> The assumption that PG_reserved is the same for head and tail pages is
> certainly correct for THP and regular hugepages, but gigantic
> hugepages allocated through bootmem don't clear the PG_reserved on the
> tail pages (the clearing of PG_reserved is done later only if the
> gigantic hugepage is freed).
> 
> This patch corrects the gigantic compound page initialization so that
> we can retain the optimization in
> 11feeb498086a3a5907b8148bdf1786a9b18fc55. The cacheline was already
> modified in order to set PG_tail so this won't affect the boot time of
> large memory systems.
> 
> Reported-by: andy123 <ajs124.ajs124@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>


>  mm/hugetlb.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index b49579c..315450e 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -695,8 +695,24 @@ static void prep_compound_gigantic_page(struct page *page, unsigned long order)
>  	/* we rely on prep_new_huge_page to set the destructor */
>  	set_compound_order(page, order);
>  	__SetPageHead(page);
> +	__ClearPageReserved(page);
>  	for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; i++, p = mem_map_next(p, page, i)) {
>  		__SetPageTail(p);
> +		/*
> +		 * For gigantic hugepages allocated through bootmem at
> +		 * boot, it's safer to be consistent with the
> +		 * not-gigantic hugepages and to clear the PG_reserved
> +		 * bit from all tail pages too. Otherwse drivers using
> +		 * get_user_pages() to access tail pages, may get the
> +		 * reference counting wrong if they see the
> +		 * PG_reserved bitflag set on a tail page (despite the
> +		 * head page didn't have PG_reserved set). Enforcing
> +		 * this consistency between head and tail pages,
> +		 * allows drivers to optimize away a check on the head
> +		 * page when they need know if put_page is needed after
> +		 * get_user_pages() or not.
> +		 */
> +		__ClearPageReserved(p);
>  		set_page_count(p, 0);
>  		p->first_page = page;
>  	}
> @@ -1329,9 +1345,9 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc(void)
>  #else
>  		page = virt_to_page(m);
>  #endif
> -		__ClearPageReserved(page);
>  		WARN_ON(page_count(page) != 1);
>  		prep_compound_huge_page(page, h->order);
> +		WARN_ON(PageReserved(page));
>  		prep_new_huge_page(h, page, page_to_nid(page));
>  		/*
>  		 * If we had gigantic hugepages allocated at boot time, we need
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/