Date:	Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:37:14 +0530
From:	Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:	Arokux X <arokux@...il.com>
CC:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: When USB PHY framework should be used?

On Friday 11 October 2013 12:51 AM, Arokux X wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> recently I have been working on mainlining a simple bus glue driver
> for the USB EHCI for the Allwinner family of the ARM SoCs aka sunxi.
> The patches are almost ready and can be found at [1] and will be
> submitted once completely ready. The most interesting patch is [2]
> which is a driver itself.
> 
> Currently everything works. Recently Maxime Ripard brought the reset
> framework to my attention which I am going to use, since each of the
> PHYs has a reset bit. Right now those bits are treated as clocks.
> 
> Later I am going to add the OHCI support. OHCI and EHCI will be
> different drivers in different modules but they will share the same
> PHY. I do not quite understand how can I correctly use reset framework
> in the case of the common PHY. Imagine a situation if EHCI and OHCI
> drivers got loaded and deassert the (same) reset bit. Then a user
> decides to rmmod one of the drivers. This will cause it to assert the
> reset bit, which will make the other driver to fail. So it is clear
> there is a need for some central manager for the reset bit which is
> going to be poked by both EHCI and OHCI.

Looks like the reset should be done in a wrapper driver. Do you have a wrapper
driver for EHCI/OHCI?
> 
> Maxime Ripard also brought to my attention the new USB phy framework
> which was merged into usb-next. However I'm not sure it should be used
> in my driver since as far as I understand a PHY of a USB Host
> Controller I'm dealing with is built into the controller itself. The
> only parts of the driver that touche a PHY are reset bits (different
> for each controller) and some initialization bits [3]. In addition the
> in the doc file phy.txt I read
> 
> "This framework will be of use only to devices that use external PHY
> (PHY functionality is not embedded within the controller)."

right. PHY framework is used when you have a separate IP for PHY. Generally in
cases where you have the PHY built in the controller, you can handle the PHY
programming in your controller driver itself.
> 
> So can you please give me some hints about the possibilities to share
> single reset bit? Should I use PHY framework, or create some kind of a
> common module that is going to be used by EHCI and OHCI. In addition I

I think you should have a wrapper driver to EHCI/OHCI to handle this reset.

Thanks
Kishon

> wanted to ask where I should normally put a common code like [4].
> 
> Thank you in advance,
> Arokux
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] https://github.com/arokux/linux/commits/sunxi-next-usb
> [2] https://github.com/arokux/linux/commit/1f271d01b8138d5a593df18a80b4129a08eac1be
> [3] https://github.com/arokux/linux/commit/1f271d01b8138d5a593df18a80b4129a08eac1be#diff-2fdea331a4331eca7c86f18cd2d87e72R89
> [4] https://github.com/arokux/linux/commit/1f271d01b8138d5a593df18a80b4129a08eac1be#diff-2fdea331a4331eca7c86f18cd2d87e72R104
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists