lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:43:48 +0300
From:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move
 acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function

On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 08:58:05AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No
> >>> functional changes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >>
> >> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's
> >> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this
> >> 100% right.
> >
> > I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new
> > version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe
> > that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both
> > series?
> 
> The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think?
> So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into
> linux-next as that comes back online.
> 
> So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on
> yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here...

Correct, this series depends on Alexandre's patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ