linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:28:15 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: create per policy rwsem instead of per CPU cpu_policy_rwsem

On 18 October 2013 21:45, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:

> Hi Viresh
>
> I tested on my Marvell Dove, which crashed and burned before with
> cpufreq-bench. This version works fine so far. The benchmark has been
> running for ten minutes, whereas before it was lucky to reach ten
> seconds.
>
> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

Hi Andrew,

Thanks a lot for reporting and testing this patch :) ..
Hopefully it will not cause any issues ones Rafael applies it for linux-next.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/