lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:01:46 +0200
From:	Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@...cle.com>
To:	"Woodhouse, David" <david.woodhouse@...el.com>
Cc:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
	"ross.philipson@...rix.com" <ross.philipson@...rix.com>,
	"stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com" <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"grub-devel@....org" <grub-devel@....org>,
	"Maliszewski, Richard L" <richard.l.maliszewski@...el.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
	"boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
	Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"keir@....org" <keir@....org>
Subject: Re: EFI and multiboot2 devlopment work for Xen

On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 03:42:42PM +0000, Woodhouse, David wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-10-22 at 16:32 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > There are two problems with this:
> >
> > 1) The kernel will only boot if it's signed with a key in db, not a key
> > in MOK.
> > 2) grub will read the kernel, but the kernel will have to read the
> > initramfs using EFI calls. That means your initramfs must be on a FAT
> > partition.
> >
> > If you're happy with those limitations then just use the chainloader
> > command. If you're not, use the linuxefi command.
>
> Well, we're talking about booting the Xen hypervisor aren't we?
>
> So yes, there are reasons the Linux kernel uses the 'boot stub' the way
> it does, but I'm not sure we advocate that Xen should emulate that in
> all its 'glory'?

Right, I think that sensible mixture of multiboot2 protocol (it is needed
to pass at least modules list to Xen; IIRC, linuxefi uses Linux Boot protocol
for it) with extension proposed by Vladimir and something similar to linuxefi
command will solve our problem (I proposed it in my first email). Users which
do not need SB may use upstream GRUB2 and others could use
'multiboot2efi extension'.

Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ