linux-kernel - [PATCH 23/24] mm: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Oct 2013 15:30:06 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 23/24] mm: Convert use of typedef ctl_table to struct ctl_table

This typedef is unnecessary and should just be removed.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
 mm/page-writeback.c |  2 +-
 mm/page_alloc.c     | 12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index f5236f8..bd0a03f 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1687,7 +1687,7 @@ void throttle_vm_writeout(gfp_t gfp_mask)
 /*
  * sysctl handler for /proc/sys/vm/dirty_writeback_centisecs
  */
-int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int dirty_writeback_centisecs_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index c1cf5f8..5a9a0d5 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -3314,7 +3314,7 @@ early_param("numa_zonelist_order", setup_numa_zonelist_order);
 /*
  * sysctl handler for numa_zonelist_order
  */
-int numa_zonelist_order_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int numa_zonelist_order_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 		void __user *buffer, size_t *length,
 		loff_t *ppos)
 {
@@ -5698,7 +5698,7 @@ module_init(init_per_zone_wmark_min)
  *	that we can call two helper functions whenever min_free_kbytes
  *	changes.
  */
-int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
@@ -5710,7 +5710,7 @@ int min_free_kbytes_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
-int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct zone *zone;
@@ -5726,7 +5726,7 @@ int sysctl_min_unmapped_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct zone *zone;
@@ -5752,7 +5752,7 @@ int sysctl_min_slab_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
  * minimum watermarks. The lowmem reserve ratio can only make sense
  * if in function of the boot time zone sizes.
  */
-int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos);
@@ -5765,7 +5765,7 @@ int lowmem_reserve_ratio_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
  * cpu.  It is the fraction of total pages in each zone that a hot per cpu
  * pagelist can have before it gets flushed back to buddy allocator.
  */
-int percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler(ctl_table *table, int write,
+int percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 	void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct zone *zone;
-- 
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/