linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 05:04:29 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	handai.szj@...bao.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu counter: cast this_cpu_sub() adjustment

On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 07:22:55 -0400 Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> We probably want to cc stable for this and the next one.  How should
> these be routed?  I can take these through percpu tree or mm works
> too.  Either way, it'd be best to route them together.

Yes, all three look like -stable material to me.  I'll grab them later
in the week if you haven't ;)

The names of the first two patches distress me.  They rather clearly
assert that the code affects percpu_counter.[ch], but that is not the case. 
Massaging is needed to fix that up.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/