lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 09:42:57 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc:	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@...il.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: ARM/kirkwood: v3.12-rc6: kernel BUG at mm/util.c:390!

On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 09:16:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi> wrote:
> >
> > On ARM v3.9 or older kernels do not trigger this BUG, at seems it only
> > started to appear with the following commit (bisected):
> >
> > commit 1bc39742aab09248169ef9d3727c9def3528b3f3
> > Author: Simon Baatz <gmbnomis@...il.com>
> > Date:   Mon Jun 10 21:10:12 2013 +0100
> >
> >     ARM: 7755/1: handle user space mapped pages in flush_kernel_dcache_page
> 
> The above commit only starts to implement the helper on ARM,
> but according to Documentation/cachetlb.txt, looks caller of
> flush_kernel_dcache_page() should make sure the passed
> 'page' is a user space page.

I don't think PageSlab() is the right test tho.  Wouldn't testing
against user_addr_max() make more sense?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ