linux-kernel - [PATCH] block: Do not call sector

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon,  4 Nov 2013 14:00:06 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Do not call sector_div() with a 64-bit divisor

do_div() (called by sector_div() if CONFIG_LBDAF=y) is meant for divisions
of 64-bit number by 32-bit numbers.  Passing 64-bit divisor types caused
issues in the past on 32-bit platforms, cfr. commit
ea077b1b96e073eac5c3c5590529e964767fc5f7 ("m68k: Truncate base in
do_div()").

As queue_limits.max_discard_sectors and .discard_granularity are unsigned
int, max_discard_sectors and granularity should be unsigned int.
As bdev_discard_alignment() returns int, alignment should be int.
Now 2 calls to sector_div() can be replaced by 32-bit arithmetic:
  - The 64-bit modulo operation can become a 32-bit modulo operation,
  - The 64-bit division and multiplication can be replaced by a 32-bit
    modulo operation and a subtraction.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
---
Please review!

 block/blk-lib.c |   10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-lib.c b/block/blk-lib.c
index d6f50d572565..9b5b561cb928 100644
--- a/block/blk-lib.c
+++ b/block/blk-lib.c
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
 	struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
 	int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
-	sector_t max_discard_sectors;
-	sector_t granularity, alignment;
+	unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
+	int alignment;
 	struct bio_batch bb;
 	struct bio *bio;
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -58,16 +58,14 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
 
 	/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same.  */
 	granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
-	alignment = bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9;
-	alignment = sector_div(alignment, granularity);
+	alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
 
 	/*
 	 * Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
 	 * granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
 	 */
 	max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
-	sector_div(max_discard_sectors, granularity);
-	max_discard_sectors *= granularity;
+	max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
 	if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
 		/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/