linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Improve "return is not a function" test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:21:25 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] checkpatch: Improve "return is not a function" test

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:12:44 -0700 Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:

> This now uses the "$balanced_parens" test and also makes
> the test depend on perl v5.10 and higher.

What happens if one uses an older perl version?  A mysterious-looking
splat, I assume?

It would be nicer to have some explicit perl version test which tells
user what the problem is, and which perl version is needed?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/