lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:09:24 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the block tree

Hi Greg,

Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lloop.c between commit ed2d2f9a8265
("block: Abstract out bvec iterator") from the block tree and commit
de40d1209898 ("staging: lustre: fix bug with LL_MRF_RETURN in
loop_make_request") from the staging tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

diff --cc drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lloop.c
index 3488bb6c44a7,e2421ea61352..000000000000
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lloop.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/lloop.c
@@@ -368,10 -365,9 +367,9 @@@ static void loop_make_request(struct re
  		goto err;
  	}
  	loop_add_bio(lo, old_bio);
- 	LL_MRF_RETURN(0);
+ 	return;
  err:
 -	cfs_bio_io_error(old_bio, old_bio->bi_size);
 +	cfs_bio_io_error(old_bio, old_bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
- 	LL_MRF_RETURN(0);
  }
  
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ