lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:33:08 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Kyungsik Lee" <kyungsik.lee@....com>
Cc:	"Matthew Daley" <mattjd@...il.com>, <chan.jeong@....com>,
	<hyojun.im@....com>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] unlz4: always set an error return code on failures

>>> On 11.11.13 at 14:02, Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:35:31AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 11.11.13 at 03:49, Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com> wrote:
>> > Hello Jan,
>> > 
>> > Thanks for the patch.
>> > 
>> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 09:27:09AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> "ret", being set to -1 early on, gets cleared by the first invocation
>> >> of lz4_decompress()/lz4_decompress_unknownoutputsize(), and hence
>> >> subsequent failures wouldn't be noticed by the caller without setting
>> >> it back to -1 right after those calls.
>> >> 
>> >> Reported-by: Matthew Daley <mattjd@...il.com>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
>> >> Cc: Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>
>> >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> >> 
>> >> --- a/lib/decompress_unlz4.c
>> >> +++ b/lib/decompress_unlz4.c
>> >> @@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ STATIC inline int INIT unlz4(u8 *input, 
>> >>  			goto exit_2;
>> >>  		}
>> >>  
>> >> +		ret = -1;
>> >>  		if (flush && flush(outp, dest_len) != dest_len)
>> >>  			goto exit_2;
>> >>  		if (output)
>> >>
>> > What do you think of adding "ret2" for keeping "ret" error status
>> > which is set by lz4_decompress*() like below.
>> 
>> I'd be fine with that too, but preferred to submit the smallest
>> possible (read: one line) patch in this case.
>>
> I think it looks neat avoiding "ret" being set to error status
> in the loop. Can you please resend the patch with those changes?

I'm sorry, I'm confused - on one hand you're asking for changes
(which I'm not going to do - I proposed the patch as is, and am
not going to put my name under one that's introducing ugliness
like "ret2"), ...

> Acked-by: Kyungsik Lee <kyungsik.lee@....com>

... yet then you give your ack to the existing patch.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ