[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:15:30 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip RFC 0/2] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and
prohibit probing on .entry.text
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> >
> > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series.
> >
> > OK, I'll do. :)
> > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which
> > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me
> > to post the series, linux-arch?
>
> I would add linux-arch.
>
> Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as
> new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in
> LKML).
We'd rather like to know about all cases where new code is added to
kprobes (or where we missed to consider some existing code).
It's really just a handful of annotations, the brunt of which is internal
to kprobes.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists