[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:53:32 +0900
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@...aro.org>
To: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"steve.capper@...aro.org" <steve.capper@...aro.org>,
"srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"Vijaya.Kumar@...iumnetworks.com" <Vijaya.Kumar@...iumnetworks.com>,
"nico@...aro.org" <nico@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"dsaxena@...aro.org" <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"jiang.liu@...wei.com" <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes)
On 11/11/2013 01:29 PM, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
> On 8 November 2013 22:34, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>>> +static inline long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + return regs->regs[0];
>>> +}
>>
>> This is also being implemented by another patch series (I think the audit
>> stuff?).
> Not sure, I did not see this being implemented in audit(audit adds for
> 'syscallno', not for return value in x0)
> I can rebase my code if this change is implemented and queued in other patchset.
Yes, my audit patch has it.
The definition is referred to in include/linux/audit.h (and ptrace.h),
too.
-Takahiro AKASHI
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists