linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] OF: Introduce utility helper functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:12:54 +0000
From:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>,
	Ionut Nicu <ioan.nicu.ext@....com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Matt Porter <matt.porter@...aro.org>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
	Alison Chaiken <Alison_Chaiken@...tor.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
	Jan Lubbe <jluebbe@...net.de>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@....com>,
	Michael Stickel <ms@...able.de>,
	Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@...il.com>,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Michael Bohan <mbohan@...eaurora.org>,
	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
	Matt Ranostay <mranostay@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] OF: Introduce utility helper functions

On Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:53:13 -0800, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> Hi Pantelis,
> 
> On 11/06/2013 01:34 AM, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> 
> >
> > As I mentioned earlier I'm trying to get this accepted in general term and then we'll
> > get around fixing any minor problems.
> >
> 
> I think it is quite likely at this point that your series will be accepted.
> 
> However, from my experience with larger submissions like this one, it is quite common
> that the maintainers ask for all feedback to be addressed before that happens -
> especially for feedback like this, where there is common understanding that some
> changes to the code are necessary.
> 
> Maybe the device tree maintainers could chime in at this point and let us all know
> what will need to happen to get the series accepted.

Since it is a big series, I would like to be able to "front-load" the
series of changes with straighforward changes that are easy to merge.
There are some exceptions though, such as when new APIs with users later
in the series. I don't really want to pull in a new API separately from
the user most of the time.

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/