lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:29:18 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Sameer Nanda <snanda@...omium.org>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.cz, rientjes@...gle.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, semenzato@...gle.com,
	murzin.v@...il.com, dserrg@...il.com, msb@...omium.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] mm, oom: Fix race when selecting process to kill

On 11/13, Sameer Nanda wrote:
>
> The selection of the process to be killed happens in two spots:
> first in select_bad_process and then a further refinement by
> looking for child processes in oom_kill_process. Since this is
> a two step process, it is possible that the process selected by
> select_bad_process may get a SIGKILL just before oom_kill_process
> executes. If this were to happen, __unhash_process deletes this
> process from the thread_group list. This results in oom_kill_process
> getting stuck in an infinite loop when traversing the thread_group
> list of the selected process.
>
> Fix this race by adding a pid_alive check for the selected process
> with tasklist_lock held in oom_kill_process.

I am fine with this patch as well, but honestly I'd prefer the previous
v5. I won't argue though.

> +/*
> + * Careful: while_each_thread is not RCU safe. Callers should hold
> + * read_lock(tasklist_lock) across while_each_thread loops.
> + */

(tasklist_lock or siglock, in fact but this doesn't matter).

This is not that simple, even tasklist_lock can't help if the task is
already dead.

Oh. Yes, sorry. I promised to send the patches "soon" many times, but
still didn't find the time.

Perhaps I should try to start with the "make this all less buggy" changes,
the "complete" fix needs to change the callers as well.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ