linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gcc4: Disable __compiletime_object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:19:29 -0800
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc4: Disable __compiletime_object_size for GCC 4.6+

On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 12:57:13PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/13/2013 10:39 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 07:49:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> __builtin_object_size is known to be broken on gcc 4.6+.
> >> See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880 for details.
> >>
> >> This causes unnecssary build warnings and errors such as
> >>
> >> In function 'copy_from_user', inlined from 'sb16_copy_from_user'
> >> 	at sound/oss/sb_audio.c:878:22:
> >> arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h:211:26: error: call to 'copy_from_user_overflow'
> >> 	declared with attribute error: copy_from_user() buffer size is not provably correct
> >> make[3]: [sound/oss/sb_audio.o] Error 1 (ignored)
> >>
> >> Disable it where broken.
> > 
> > Is there an alternative? This means that things like
> > DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS are being rendered useless. I don't think
> > this is _always_ broken, just under certain situations, right?
> > 
> 
> It would be one thing to block it for, say, gcc 4.6 and 4.7 only, but
> without an upper cap I don't think this is at all okay.
> 
Also please have a look into https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/10/21/52.
That patch has been accepted (3df7b41aa5e); maybe above commit
(2fb0815c9) is now unnecessary and can be reverted.

I don't know about parisc (Jan was concerned about that), but at least
on x86 I don't see above warning anymore after reverting my patch.

Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/