linux-kernel - [patch] perf/trace properly use u64 to hold event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 12:39:45 -0500 (EST)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [patch] perf/trace properly use u64 to hold event_id


The 64-bit attr.config value for perf trace events was being copied into
an "int" before doing a comparison, meaning the top 32 bits were
being truncated.

As far as I can tell this didn't cause any errors, but it did mean
it was possible to create valid aliases for all the tracepoint ids
which I don't think was intended.  (For example, 0xffffffff00000018
and 0x18 both enable the same tracepoint).

Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
index 78e27e3..280c3db0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int perf_trace_event_init(struct ftrace_event_call *tp_event,
 int perf_trace_init(struct perf_event *p_event)
 {
 	struct ftrace_event_call *tp_event;
-	int event_id = p_event->attr.config;
+	u64 event_id = p_event->attr.config;
 	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/