linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: properly use FUSE clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:33:43 +0900
From:	Alex Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
CC:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: tegra: properly use FUSE clock

On 11/18/2013 08:43 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:40:47PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> FUSE clock is enabled by most bootloaders, but we cannot expect it to be
>> on in all contexts (e.g. kexec).
>>
>> This patch adds a FUSE clkdev to all Tegra platforms and makes sure
>> it is enabled before touching FUSE registers. tegra_init_fuse() is
>> invoked during very early boot and thus cannot rely on the clock
>> framework ; therefore the FUSE clock is forcibly enabled using a
>> register write in that function, and remains that way until the
>> clock framework can be used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c       | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c |  1 +
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra124.c |  1 +
>>   drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c  |  1 +
>
> Isn't this missing the clock driver changes for Tegra30? Ah... Tegra30
> already has this clock defined. I wonder why only Tegra30 has it. grep
> says that fuse-tegra isn't used by any drivers, which also indicates
> that perhaps we don't need the .dev_id in the first place. We should be
> able to get by with just the .con_id = "fuse".

Will fix that.

> Also are there any reasons to keep this in one single patch? Since none
> of the fuse clocks are used yet, I think the clock changes could be a
> separate patch that can go in through the clock tree. And there isn't
> even a hard runtime dependency, since if the Tegra changes were to go in
> without the clock changes, then the fallback code in this patch should
> still turn the clock on properly. It just might not be turned off again,
> but isn't that something we can live with for a short period of time? I
> think perhaps that could even be improved, see further below.
>
> I've added Mike on Cc, he'll need to either take the patch in through
> his tree or Ack this one, so he needs to see it eventually.

I will split the change into two patches - at first I thought it would 
not be worth the trouble, but I overlooked the fact this needed to go 
through the clock source tree.

>
>>   4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c
>> index 9a4e910c3796..3b9191b930b5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/fuse.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/io.h>
>>   #include <linux/export.h>
>>   #include <linux/random.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/tegra-soc.h>
>>
>>   #include "fuse.h"
>> @@ -54,6 +55,7 @@ int tegra_cpu_speedo_id;		/* only exist in Tegra30 and later */
>>   int tegra_soc_speedo_id;
>>   enum tegra_revision tegra_revision;
>>
>> +static struct clk *fuse_clk;
>>   static int tegra_fuse_spare_bit;
>>   static void (*tegra_init_speedo_data)(void);
>>
>> @@ -77,6 +79,22 @@ static const char *tegra_revision_name[TEGRA_REVISION_MAX] = {
>>   	[TEGRA_REVISION_A04]     = "A04",
>>   };
>>
>> +static void tegra_fuse_enable_clk(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (IS_ERR(fuse_clk))
>> +		fuse_clk = clk_get_sys("fuse-tegra", "fuse");
>> +	if (IS_ERR(fuse_clk))
>> +		return;
>
> Perhaps instead of just returning here, this should actually be where
> the code to enable the clock should go.
>
>> +	clk_prepare_enable(fuse_clk);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void tegra_fuse_disable_clk(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (IS_ERR(fuse_clk))
>> +		return;
>
> And this is where we could disable it again. That way we should get
> equal functionality in both cases.

What Stephen said, basically - but let me address that in the other mail.

Thanks for the review!
Alex.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/